🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are observing closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing chorus of countries are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that phones and platforms are "stealing our children's youth". The policy is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "an measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked parliament to approve a bill raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is granted. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the move does not create binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a useful starting point," stated a leading European lawmaker behind the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Last year, support grew behind a proposal to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a young person who died after being exposed to harmful platform posts suggests that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," commented a leading peer.

America: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, regulation is primarily unfolding at the regional level due to country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has signed a measure barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a rule capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced bills requiring parental consent for teenagers to open social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from various individuals to copy this example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Views

Outside of these regions, further nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, international organizations take a more nuanced stance. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

Even as this worldwide discussion continues, the policies of this nation and several other countries indicate that policymakers globally are less and less content to wait for the industry to self-regulate.